Poeciliid Research / Article

Sex-limited coloration in guppy females: genetic and hormonal basis...

Research Article
Sex-limited coloration in guppy females: genetic and hormonal basis
1Vanda M. Csibi, 2Victor Roman, 3Bogdan Petrescu-Mag, 4Konstantina T. Meligoniti, 5Grzegorz Prusinowski
1 Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania; 2 Municipal Hospital “Dr. Eugen Nicoară”, Reghin, Mureș County, Romania; 3 "Tiberiu Popoviciu" High School of Computer Science, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 4 Scientific Society of Hellenic Medical Students (SSHMS), Ilisia, Athens, Greece; 5 Klub Poecilia Reticulata, Płock, Poland. Corresponding author: B. Petrescu-Mag, bogdaneco22@gmail.com
Published2026
JournalPoeciliid Research
Volume / Issue16(1)/2026
Pagespp. 20-31
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.67784/0088
AccessOpen Access

Abstract

Female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) generally lack the conspicuous ornamental pigmentation characteristic of males, although the underlying genetic determinants of coloration are present in both sexes. This mini-review examines the genetic, chromosomal, hormonal, developmental, and evolutionary mechanisms underlying sex-limited pigmentation in guppies, with particular emphasis on the relationship between sex linkage, recombination, and phenotypic expression. The guppy possesses an XY sex-determination system on chromosome pair 12, and current genomic, cytogenetic, and linkage evidence indicates that its sex chromosomes remain largely homomorphic and retain substantial regions capable of X–Y recombination. Rather than forming a simple nonrecombining block, chromosome 12 exhibits a recombination gradient, with strongly reduced exchange around the sex-determining region and progressively higher recombination toward the distal pseudoautosomal region. Classical genetic studies have demonstrated extensive Y-linked inheritance of male coloration, together with X- and Y-linked loci whose expression is restricted to males and a smaller contribution from autosomal loci. The absence of ornamental coloration in females therefore reflects predominantly sex-limited and hormonally regulated gene expression rather than the absence of pigmentation genes. Experimental androgen treatment can induce male-like coloration in females, further supporting a regulatory basis for sexual dimorphism. In domesticated ornamental strains, this regulatory restriction can be altered, allowing certain dominant sex-linked color patterns to be expressed in females. The developmental formation of pigmentation involves temporally distinct pigment-cell populations and signaling pathways associated with melanophore, xanthophore, and iridophore differentiation. Finally, female mate choice and predation jointly shape the evolution and maintenance of male coloration, while variation in visual sensitivity may contribute to coevolution between female perception and male ornamental traits. Overall, guppy pigmentation provides a particularly informative model for understanding how chromosome structure, recombination, hormonal regulation, and sexual selection interact to produce sexually dimorphic phenotypes.

Keywords

Poecilia reticulata sexual dimorphism pigmentation genetics sex chromosomes pseudoautosomal region X–Y recombination androgen regulation pigment cells ornamental strains mate choice
Download PDF ← Back to Issue